https://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1130

Cindy Sage comments on Dariusz Leszczynski's blog
https://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1131

Perhaps ICNIRP's epidemiology has it terribly wrong
https://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1132

Dariusz's Leszczynski response to Cindy Sage's comments
https://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1135

ICNIRP's latest ELF guidelines in the making
https://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1137

--------

First, prof' Richter's study on soldiers exposed to microwave radiation in the army showed shortened latency period for brain tumors - <10 years only in young workers. Int J Occup and Env Health 6 page 187-193, 2000. He predicted this would happened with cell phone users. Second, we must not forget that most works on cell phones are simply biased in their methods, most of them were industry funded and it was felt in the way they were done. When studies are biased anything can be underestimation, both long and short term risk. That Rothman relied and agreed with their assumption which is already biased, is what can drive nuts anyone who looks for an objective view from leading people in the field.


Iris Atzmon



https://omega.twoday.net/search?q=microwave+radiation
https://omega.twoday.net/search?q=cancer
https://omega.twoday.net/search?q=ICNIRP
https://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Interphone
https://omega.twoday.net/search?q=STUK
https://omega.twoday.net/search?q=guidelines
https://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Leszczynski
https://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Cindy+Sage
https://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Ziegelberger